🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 is remembered as one of the most deadly – and consequential – days during multiple decades of violence in the region.

In the streets of the incident – the legacy of Bloody Sunday are painted on the structures and seared in people's minds.

A protest demonstration was conducted on a cold but bright day in the city.

The demonstration was opposing the practice of detention without trial – holding suspects without due process – which had been implemented after three years of unrest.

Soldiers from the specialized division shot dead 13 people in the Bogside area – which was, and remains, a overwhelmingly republican population.

A particular photograph became particularly prominent.

Images showed a religious figure, Father Daly, using a bloodied fabric while attempting to shield a assembly moving a young man, the injured teenager, who had been killed.

News camera operators recorded extensive video on the day.

Documented accounts includes Father Daly informing a reporter that military personnel "gave the impression they would fire in all directions" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no reason for the discharge of weapons.

That version of events wasn't accepted by the initial investigation.

The initial inquiry found the Army had been fired upon initially.

Throughout the resolution efforts, the ruling party commissioned another inquiry, after campaigning by family members, who said the initial inquiry had been a inadequate investigation.

During 2010, the findings by Lord Saville said that overall, the soldiers had discharged weapons initially and that zero among the casualties had presented danger.

The contemporary Prime Minister, the leader, issued an apology in the House of Commons – declaring fatalities were "without justification and unjustifiable."

Authorities began to investigate the events.

One former paratrooper, identified as Soldier F, was brought to trial for homicide.

He was charged over the deaths of the first individual, twenty-two, and 26-year-old the second individual.

The accused was further implicated of trying to kill Patrick O'Donnell, additional persons, more people, an additional individual, and an unidentified individual.

There is a judicial decision maintaining the soldier's identity protection, which his attorneys have maintained is required because he is at threat.

He stated to the examination that he had solely shot at people who were armed.

That claim was dismissed in the concluding document.

Information from the investigation would not be used immediately as proof in the court case.

In court, the defendant was shielded from sight using a privacy screen.

He addressed the court for the first time in the hearing at a hearing in that month, to answer "not guilty" when the allegations were read.

Family members of the deceased on that day made the trip from the city to the judicial building each day of the proceedings.

One relative, whose sibling was killed, said they always knew that listening to the proceedings would be difficult.

"I can see the events in my recollection," John said, as we visited the main locations referenced in the case – from the location, where Michael was shot dead, to the nearby Glenfada Park, where James Wray and the second person were killed.

"It even takes me back to my position that day.

"I helped to carry my brother and lay him in the vehicle.

"I relived the entire event during the evidence.

"Despite experiencing all that – it's still meaningful for me."